Ciudades con más presión económica en Arizona (2026)
Las 68 ciudades de Arizona clasificadas
| Posición | Ciudad | Puntaje | Inquilinos que gastan 30%+ de sus ingresos en renta | Hogares con ingresos menores de $35k | Tasa de pobreza | Tasa de desempleo | Renta como % del ingreso medio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nogales | 97.7 | 45.5% | 42.5% | 28.0% | 15.7% | 20.5% |
| 2 | Flowing Wells | 96.8 | 52.2% | 40.5% | 24.0% | 8.9% | 31.2% |
| 3 | Douglas | 96.3 | 45.6% | 41.9% | 27.8% | 12.3% | 22.0% |
| 4 | Bullhead City | 94.9 | 54.5% | 35.9% | 18.7% | 11.5% | 25.6% |
| 5 | Sun City | 92.9 | 68.1% | 29.9% | 11.2% | 6.2% | 34.5% |
| 6 | Coolidge | 91.6 | 45.4% | 24.8% | 19.9% | 14.1% | 23.5% |
| 7 | Rio Rico | 89.1 | 62.0% | 26.6% | 16.6% | 10.5% | 21.3% |
| 8 | Sun Lakes | 89.0 | 72.5% | 25.0% | 9.4% | 4.5% | 34.3% |
| 9 | Sun City West | 84.0 | 75.5% | 22.7% | 7.6% | 3.8% | 31.5% |
| 10 | Flagstaff | 83.8 | 58.0% | 24.2% | 18.2% | 5.7% | 27.6% |
| 11 | Tucson | 83.7 | 55.4% | 30.5% | 18.9% | 6.2% | 24.1% |
| 12 | New Kingman-Butler | 81.8 | 35.7% | 40.8% | 20.8% | 4.1% | 29.8% |
| 13 | Eloy | 80.5 | 44.3% | 36.3% | 23.1% | 6.2% | 21.1% |
| 14 | Cottonwood | 78.3 | 45.7% | 37.4% | 18.6% | 3.1% | 27.7% |
| 15 | Glendale | 74.3 | 58.4% | 20.5% | 15.1% | 5.6% | 24.9% |
| 16 | Fortuna Foothills | 73.4 | 53.9% | 25.5% | 12.1% | 7.3% | 22.6% |
| 17 | Apache Junction | 73.2 | 55.7% | 28.9% | 10.6% | 6.5% | 22.6% |
| 18 | Casa Grande | 71.9 | 57.7% | 20.9% | 13.5% | 6.1% | 23.8% |
| 19 | Saddlebrooke | 71.9 | 34.1% | 13.9% | 5.4% | 9.3% | 37.5% |
| 20 | Sierra Vista Southeast | 71.4 | 69.9% | 17.2% | 8.0% | 8.3% | 18.8% |
| 21 | Tempe | 71.0 | 52.7% | 18.9% | 15.8% | 5.5% | 26.3% |
| 22 | Yuma | 67.8 | 52.4% | 24.5% | 15.5% | 6.3% | 20.4% |
| 23 | Kingman | 66.5 | 47.6% | 27.7% | 14.3% | 6.7% | 20.5% |
| 24 | Payson | 65.9 | 46.2% | 24.8% | 11.0% | 7.1% | 23.8% |
| 25 | Green Valley | 63.8 | 69.9% | 26.5% | 7.7% | 2.4% | 22.6% |
| 26 | Lake Havasu City | 63.3 | 51.5% | 23.9% | 14.1% | 5.0% | 22.6% |
| 27 | El Mirage | 63.0 | 48.1% | 15.4% | 12.5% | 5.8% | 27.8% |
| 28 | Fort Mohave | 62.5 | 40.8% | 24.9% | 11.8% | 9.7% | 18.7% |
| 29 | Prescott | 60.9 | 52.5% | 24.1% | 11.7% | 4.5% | 23.6% |
| 30 | Drexel Heights | 60.5 | 51.9% | 20.3% | 14.6% | 5.3% | 21.9% |
| 31 | San Luis | 59.6 | 37.2% | 31.5% | 18.1% | 8.0% | 15.0% |
| 32 | Show Low | 59.3 | 48.2% | 28.5% | 12.2% | 4.7% | 22.1% |
| 33 | Phoenix | 58.9 | 51.8% | 18.9% | 13.7% | 5.0% | 23.3% |
| 34 | Verde Village | 54.2 | 50.9% | 23.2% | 13.1% | 4.7% | 20.3% |
| 35 | Avondale | 53.3 | 55.1% | 15.5% | 10.9% | 3.6% | 25.5% |
| 36 | Mesa | 52.9 | 55.1% | 17.4% | 10.3% | 4.2% | 23.5% |
| 37 | Surprise | 50.1 | 55.6% | 12.8% | 8.6% | 4.3% | 25.2% |
| 38 | Peoria | 49.3 | 59.1% | 14.7% | 8.4% | 4.0% | 23.1% |
| 39 | Prescott Valley | 48.7 | 50.1% | 18.4% | 11.7% | 2.8% | 25.4% |
| 40 | Sierra Vista | 48.5 | 46.8% | 24.3% | 12.0% | 4.8% | 19.6% |
| 41 | Anthem | 46.3 | 61.3% | 9.3% | 4.1% | 4.4% | 25.4% |
| 42 | Safford | 44.4 | 37.4% | 29.1% | 14.1% | 4.3% | 19.2% |
| 43 | Maricopa | 44.3 | 52.4% | 9.7% | 7.4% | 5.0% | 24.9% |
| 44 | Goodyear | 44.0 | 64.0% | 9.3% | 5.2% | 4.2% | 22.7% |
| 45 | Casas Adobes | 42.2 | 51.7% | 15.2% | 6.6% | 4.3% | 23.7% |
| 46 | Camp Verde | 39.8 | 32.1% | 23.5% | 15.5% | 5.8% | 18.4% |
| 47 | Chino Valley | 39.8 | 32.0% | 19.1% | 11.4% | 5.3% | 24.5% |
| 48 | Fountain Hills | 38.8 | 52.4% | 14.9% | 6.2% | 5.3% | 20.1% |
| 49 | Sahuarita | 37.4 | 44.9% | 10.6% | 8.6% | 6.4% | 21.1% |
| 50 | Buckeye | 36.5 | 45.7% | 10.8% | 8.0% | 4.9% | 23.7% |
| 51 | San Tan Valley | 36.5 | 44.7% | 9.8% | 8.0% | 4.3% | 25.9% |
| 52 | Tucson Estates | 32.7 | 40.6% | 25.5% | 7.8% | 2.4% | 22.5% |
| 53 | Scottsdale | 31.7 | 48.2% | 14.4% | 7.3% | 3.6% | 21.8% |
| 54 | New River | 27.6 | 62.7% | 9.2% | 6.3% | 3.0% | 17.4% |
| 55 | Somerton | 26.2 | 39.1% | 23.1% | 13.8% | 3.7% | 14.5% |
| 56 | Chandler | 25.2 | 45.6% | 11.3% | 7.9% | 3.6% | 21.1% |
| 57 | Tucson Mountains | 23.1 | 59.4% | 13.9% | 8.9% | 3.0% | 12.9% |
| 58 | Florence | 22.8 | 29.7% | 16.3% | 6.9% | 6.6% | 19.6% |
| 59 | Gilbert | 18.9 | 46.4% | 8.7% | 5.3% | 3.5% | 20.7% |
| 60 | Marana | 18.1 | 41.8% | 11.4% | 4.9% | 4.5% | 19.4% |
| 61 | Oro Valley | 17.2 | 46.8% | 13.8% | 6.5% | 2.3% | 18.7% |
| 62 | Queen Creek | 16.5 | 48.7% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 4.3% | 18.7% |
| 63 | Gold Canyon | 15.4 | 43.9% | 10.0% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 19.8% |
| 64 | Tanque Verde | 10.2 | 53.6% | 7.3% | 2.3% | 4.4% | 13.3% |
| 65 | Catalina Foothills | 7.5 | 43.3% | 12.9% | 4.5% | 2.7% | 14.7% |
| 66 | Valencia West | 7.1 | 8.9% | 15.0% | 15.0% | 2.8% | 22.2% |
| 67 | Vail | 6.2 | 42.4% | 8.0% | 4.3% | 1.6% | 18.9% |
| 68 | Paradise Valley | 1.1 | 21.1% | 10.0% | 5.5% | 2.1% | 17.0% |
Puntaje = percentil nacional (100 = más presión que todas las demás ciudades clasificadas de EE. UU.). Mira la clasificación nacional o los préstamos personales en Arizona.
Descarga el conjunto de datos completo (CSV)
Metodología
El Índice de Presión Económica (Cash Strain Index) combina cinco medidas de presión financiera de los hogares para cada ciudad de EE. UU. con 10,000+ habitantes que tiene datos completos (4,121 ciudades; se excluyen las ciudades universitarias con una edad media menor de 25 porque los hogares de estudiantes distorsionan las medidas de ingresos): la proporción de inquilinos que gastan 30% o más de sus ingresos en renta, la proporción de hogares con ingresos menores de $35,000,, la tasa de pobreza, la tasa de desempleo y la renta anual media como porcentaje del ingreso medio del hogar. Cada medida se estandariza (puntaje z) entre todas las ciudades clasificadas y las cinco se promedian con el mismo peso. El puntaje que se muestra es un percentil de 0 a 100,, donde 100 significa más presión que todas las demás ciudades clasificadas. La lista nacional clasifica ciudades con 100,000+ habitantes; las listas estatales clasifican todas las ciudades con 10,000+ habitantes.
Datos: Oficina del Censo de EE. UU., American Community Survey, estimaciones de 5 años 2020–2024 (tablas B25070, B19001, B17001, B23025, B25064, B19013). Las estimaciones de ACS tienen márgenes de error, por lo que las diferencias pequeñas entre posiciones vecinas no son significativas.
Usa estos datos
Periodistas, investigadores y blogueros pueden usar estas clasificaciones y el CSV dando crédito y un enlace a esta página (“Zebra Finance Cash Strain Index 2026”). Preguntas o un análisis personalizado para tu ciudad: support@zebrafinance.com.